Saturday, May 20, 2006


On Immigration - An Obvious Thought

In listening to all the political mechinations of both parties, on Immigration, I have yet to hear a suggestion that another of today's ubiquitous data bases be developed. Every person caught crossing the border illegally or caught in the U.S. illegally should have all personal details, finger prints, and a photo placed into this illegal immigration data base.

No person in the illegal immigration data base may ever become a United States Citizen. They can come in, work, or whatever, until they're caught and sent back out of the country. However, under no circumstance may they become a citizen.

Terry D. Barhorst

Other links:

Media Matters for America.

Common Dreams * Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.

Buzzflash News.

Latest post to DemLog.

Friday, May 19, 2006


Clara S. Haigler, 1924-2006

Clara Haigler, retired cosmetologistColumbia, S.C. -- Clara S. Haigler, 81, a retired cosmetologist, left, died Thursday.  Family visitation is Saturday evening at Shives Funeral Home at 5202 Colonial Drive, Columbia, South Carolina 29203.  Funeral Services are at St. Andrews Lutheran Church, Columbia, on Sunday afternoon.
Mattie Clara Shipley was born Nov. 15, 1924, in N. Charleston, S.C., the daughter of the late Charles Guy Shipley and Mattie Clara Robinson Shipley.  She was the widow of Dr. David J. Haigler.
Mrs. Haigler is survived by her four children, David, formerly of Abilene, and his wife Becky, Stephen, of Anderson, S.C., and his wife Dawn, Michael, of Columbia, and Diane, of Beaufort, S.C.; her five grandchildren, Justin, of Euless, Tx, Kimberly, of Anderson, S.C., Whitney, of Greenville, S.C., Kiersten, of Houston, Tx, and Brantly, of Anderson; one brother, Guy Fred Shipley, of Lees Summit, Mo; one brother in law, Billy Haigler, of Grafton, Va., and his wife Kitty; one sister in law, Helen Shipley, of Trenton, Fla.; two great-granddaughters; and 14 nieces and nephews. 
Three siblings predeceased her, brother Welton Shipley, brother Victor Shipley, and sister Ouida S. Owens.
Information is available at info@shivesfuneralhome.com, at 803-754-6290 or at http://www.shivesfuneralhome.com/home4.asp?fhid=17938.
D. W. Haigler, Jr.
email: Judge@Haigler.Info
cell: 325 829-5959

Wednesday, May 17, 2006


Tom Friedman’s Flexible Deadlines

Iraq’s ‘decisive’ six months have lasted two and a half years


New York Times foreign affairs columnist Tom Friedman is considered by many of his media colleagues to be one of the wisest observers of international affairs. “You have a global brain, my friend,” MSNBC host Chris Matthews once told Friedman (4/21/05). “You’re amazing. You amaze me every time you write a book.”

Such praise is not uncommon. Friedman’s appeal seems to rest on his ability to discuss complex issues in the simplest possible terms. On a recent episode of MSNBC’s Hardball (5/11/06), for example, Friedman boiled down the intricacies of the Iraq situation into a make-or-break deadline: “Well, I think that we’re going to find out, Chris, in the next year to six months—probably sooner—whether a decent outcome is possible there, and I think we’re going to have to just let this play out.”

That confident prediction would seem a lot more insightful, however, if Friedman hadn’t been making essentially the same forecast almost since the beginning of the Iraq War. A review of Friedman’s punditry reveals a long series of similar do-or-die dates that never seem to get any closer.

“The next six months in Iraq—which will determine the prospects for democracy-building there—are the most important six months in U.S. foreign policy in a long, long time.”
(New York Times, 11/30/03)

“What I absolutely don’t understand is just at the moment when we finally have a UN-approved Iraqi-caretaker government made up of—I know a lot of these guys—reasonably decent people and more than reasonably decent people, everyone wants to declare it’s over. I don’t get it. It might be over in a week, it might be over in a month, it might be over in six months, but what’s the rush? Can we let this play out, please?”
(NPR’s Fresh Air, 6/3/04)

“What we’re gonna find out, Bob, in the next six to nine months is whether we have liberated a country or uncorked a civil war.”
(CBS’s Face the Nation, 10/3/04)

“Improv time is over. This is crunch time. Iraq will be won or lost in the next few months. But it won’t be won with high rhetoric. It will be won on the ground in a war over the last mile.”
(New York Times, 11/28/04)

“I think we’re in the end game now…. I think we’re in a six-month window here where it’s going to become very clear and this is all going to pre-empt I think the next congressional election—that’s my own feeling— let alone the presidential one.”
(NBC’s Meet the Press, 9/25/05)

“Maybe the cynical Europeans were right. Maybe this neighborhood is just beyond transformation. That will become clear in the next few months as we see just what kind of minority the Sunnis in Iraq intend to be. If they come around, a decent outcome in Iraq is still possible, and we should stay to help build it. If they won’t, then we are wasting our time.”
(New York Times, 9/28/05)

“We’ve teed up this situation for Iraqis, and I think the next six months really are going to determine whether this country is going to collapse into three parts or more or whether it’s going to come together.”
(CBS’s Face the Nation, 12/18/05)

“We’re at the beginning of I think the decisive I would say six months in Iraq, OK, because I feel like this election—you know, I felt from the beginning Iraq was going to be ultimately, Charlie, what Iraqis make of it.”
(PBS’s Charlie Rose Show, 12/20/05)

“The only thing I am certain of is that in the wake of this election, Iraq will be what Iraqis make of it—and the next six months will tell us a lot. I remain guardedly hopeful.”
(New York Times, 12/21/05)

“I think that we’re going to know after six to nine months whether this project has any chance of succeeding. In which case, I think the American people as a whole will want to play it out or whether it really is a fool’s errand.”
(Oprah Winfrey Show, 1/23/06)

“I think we’re in the end game there, in the next three to six months, Bob. We’ve got for the first time an Iraqi government elected on the basis of an Iraqi constitution. Either they’re going to produce the kind of inclusive consensual government that we aspire to in the near term, in which case America will stick with it, or they’re not, in which case I think the bottom’s going to fall out.”
(CBS, 1/31/06)

“I think we are in the end game. The next six to nine months are going to tell whether we can produce a decent outcome in Iraq.”
(NBC’s Today, 3/2/06)

“Can Iraqis get this government together? If they do, I think the American public will continue to want to support the effort there to try to produce a decent, stable Iraq. But if they don’t, then I think the bottom is going to fall out of public support here for the whole Iraq endeavor. So one way or another, I think we’re in the end game in the sense it’s going to be decided in the next weeks or months whether there’s an Iraq there worth investing in. And that is something only Iraqis can tell us.”
(CNN, 4/23/06)

“Well, I think that we’re going to find out, Chris, in the next year to six months—probably sooner—whether a decent outcome is possible there, and I think we’re going to have to just let this play out.”
(MSNBC’s Hardball, 5/11/06)



Another of Terry's Outré quickies.

From the information I have looked at, we could hire all of the elderly population of this country living below the poverty line, $100 a day, if we didn't send the guard to the Mexican border or train more border patrol officers. There would be enough eligible seniors to link arms along the entire border. We could take the trailers sitting empty since Katrina and use them to shelter the seniors when they aren't on "standing patrol."

Terry D. Barhorst Sr.

Other links:

Media Matters for America.

Common Dreams * Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.

Buzzflash News.

Latest post to DemLog.

Monday, May 15, 2006


Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling

May 15, 2006 10:33 AM
Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report

A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we call in an effort to root out confidential sources.

“It’s time for you to get some new cell phones, quick,” the source told us in an in-person conversation.
ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.
Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.
One former official was asked to sign a document stating he was not a confidential source for New York Times reporter James Risen.
Our reports on the CIA’s secret prisons in Romania and Poland were known to have upset CIA officials.

People questioned by the FBI about leaks of intelligence information say the CIA was also disturbed by ABC News reports that revealed the use of CIA predator missiles inside Pakistan.
Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.
The official who warned ABC News said there was no indication our phones were being tapped so the content of the conversation could be recorded.
A pattern of phone calls from a reporter, however, could provide valuable clues for leak investigators.


JP Sez:

The Police State is here, NOW!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Donate to DemLog, a project of Marcus Comton (click on box below to go to PayPal and donate). Thank you very much: