Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Two Deadlines and an Exit
Washington -- We are now in the third war in Iraq in as many years. The first was against Saddam Hussein and his supposed weapons of mass destruction. The second was against terrorists whom, the administration said, it was better to fight over there than here. Now we find our troops in the middle of an escalating civil war.
Half of the service members listed on the Vietnam Memorial Wall died after America's leaders knew our strategy would not work. It was immoral then and it would be immoral now to engage in the same delusion. We want democracy in Iraq, but Iraqis must want it as much as we do. Our valiant soldiers can't bring democracy to Iraq if Iraq's leaders are unwilling themselves to make the compromises that democracy requires.
As our generals have said, the war cannot be won militarily. It must be won politically. No American soldier should be sacrificed because Iraqi politicians refuse to resolve their ethnic and political differences.
So far, Iraqi leaders have responded only to deadlines a deadline to transfer authority to a provisional government, and a deadline to hold three elections.
Now we must set another deadline to extricate our troops and get Iraq up on its own two feet. Iraqi politicians should be told that they have until May 15 to put together an effective unity government or we will immediately withdraw our military. If Iraqis aren't willing to build a unity government in the five months since the election, they're probably not willing to build one at all. The civil war will only get worse, and we will have no choice anyway but to leave.
If Iraq's leaders succeed in putting together a government, then we must agree on another deadline: a schedule for withdrawing American combat forces by year's end. Doing so will empower the new Iraqi leadership, put Iraqis in the position of running their own country and undermine support for the insurgency, which is fueled in large measure by the majority of Iraqis who want us to leave their country. Only troops essential to finishing the job of training Iraqi forces should remain.
For this transition to work, we must finally begin to engage in genuine diplomacy. We must immediately bring the leaders of the Iraqi factions together at a Dayton Accords-like summit meeting. In a neutral setting, Iraqis, working with our allies, the Arab League and the United Nations, would be compelled to reach a political agreement that includes security guarantees, the dismantling of the militias and shared goals for reconstruction.
To increase the pressure on Iraq's leaders, we must redeploy American forces to garrisoned status. Troops should be used for security backup, training and emergency response; we should leave routine patrols to Iraqi forces. Special operations against Al Qaeda and other foreign terrorists in Iraq should be initiated only on hard intelligence leads.
We will defeat Al Qaeda faster when we stop serving as its best recruitment tool. Iraqis ultimately will not tolerate foreign jihadists on their soil, and the United States will be able to maintain an over-the-horizon troop presence with rapid response capacity. An exit from Iraq will also strengthen our hand in dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat and allow us to repair the damage of repeated deployments, which flag officers believe has strained military readiness and morale.
For three years now, the administration has told us that terrible things will happen if we get tough with the Iraqis. In fact, terrible things are happening now because we haven't gotten tough enough. With two deadlines, we can change all that. We can put the American leadership on the side of our soldiers and push the Iraqi leadership to do what only it can do: build a democracy.
*John F. Kerry, a senator from Massachusetts, was the Democratic nominee for president in 2004.
Other Recent DemLog Items:
- Reuters: US uses front companies for "rendition"--Amnesty
- ABC: Tribunal Rules Questioned at Gitmo Hearing
- OpEdNews: Progressive editor threatened by Capitol Police
- AP: Genocide charges for gassing Kurds added to Saddam's case
- AP: DeLay to resign from Congress - April 4
- AP: Rice & Straw lobby Iraqis for strong leadership
If those links don't work, try our political blog: http://demlog.blogspot.com.
Here is a man who has fallen over the middle trying to leap from side to side politically.
All of these switches in policy have been orchestrated upon his ambitions for power above truth-with truth against power being a convenient ploy to satisfy his conscience.
But he is at least, at this stage, trying to offer suggestions to end the conflict in Iraq.
A conflict he supported with as much zeal as Bush did.
Then became Gandhi-lite when he was running for President.
I hold in my mind one endearing and brave image
of him-the soldier before congress explaining the atrocities of his country in Vietnam.
For this all Americans should be proud.
But then the ambitions took over.
Maybe this new switch can motivate his dormant
party and the brain-dead U.S. government to deal with the crimes it is perpetrating.
He is not offering a plan for the chaos and quagmire of Iraq-but maybe his words and actions could help.
I would be remiss if I did'nt mention my own plan.
Please check it out at my blog:sevenpointman
I sent it to Kerry just yesterday.
Maybe the progressive John will be inspired enough to read it and bring it to the attention to others.
Links to this post:
Donate to DemLog, a project of Marcus Comton (click on box below to go to PayPal and donate). Thank you very much: